Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Willis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 21:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Willis

This article is merely disambiguation page full of redlinks. None of the redlinked persons appear to pass WP:BIO, and the page seems to serve no other purpose than to house a few inline external links. The first two on the list were both articles at one point, but were both deleted per separate AfDs (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Willis (personal trainer) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Willis (broadcaster)) with the former being redeleted post rem under CSD A7. The only redlinks in the list which aren't orphaned are Steve Willis (personal trainer) (mostly from articles related to The Biggest Loser) and Steve Willis (comix artist) (one link from List of minicomics creators). Delete on nine counts of non-notability. haz (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There has been a previous AfD for this article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Willis); however, I'm guessing that the deleted article bears no resemblance to the article in its current form, looking not only at the previous AfD discussion but also at this move log, therefore the article is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G4 as it was in previous instances. haz (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BEANS (we don't actually want most of these redlinks). If any of them, like the playwright, becomes notable then an article may be created, and if any OTHER does then disambiguation via hatnote is recommended anyway. I don't see us meeting the three-items rule of thumb anytime soon. This verges on WP:CSD#G6 (uncontroversial maintenance). --Dhartung | Talk 18:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a sea of red links; very few if any are actually likely to have pages. I could see this going down as a G6 too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:MOSDAB. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G6 Agree with Dhartung. This is just housekeeping, no point whatever so ever in this page existing. --neon white talk 22:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.