Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SNOW Keep - firm, very rapid, consensus that clearly notability is demonstrated and existence or absence of other articles does not have relevance to retention of this article Nosebagbear (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the other seven seasons have articles, why should this one? I suppose we could also create articles for the remaining six seasons, but this topic is already covered at List of Star Trek: Voyager episodes. Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 03:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 03:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 03:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep: This is a very well-written, well-sourced article that was classified as a Good Article in 2015. "Why should we have this" is not a sufficient rationale for deleting it. Yes, go ahead and create articles for the other six seasons. I hope that you put as much work and care into them as the editors who produced this article obviously did. — Toughpigs (talk) 03:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep - Basically an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. Well sourced and clearly passes notability. --Masem (t) 03:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is nothing unusual about a television season having its own article. It may very well be that because of the casting changes this was just the easiest season for someone to write about.--Mpen320 (talk) 03:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to jump in as one of the GA authors - I just happened to get hold of a bunch of Dreamwatch magazines from that period. Always meant to get around to the other seasons, but it just never happened. Voyager is very hard to source as there just weren't many behind the scenes books/info out at the time. If I recall correctly, at the time of the improvement to this article, there were other season articles but they were just episode lists. While the only Voyager season GA, there are a further six other Star Trek season articles there too. So this isn't a total stand-alone thing. Miyagawa (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per above. Perfectly normal article. /Julle (talk) 11:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Just because other seasons don't have articles doesn't mean this season should not have an article. Other seasons are irrelevant to the notability of this article. epicgenius (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.