Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanislav Shekshnia (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stanislav Shekshnia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried delete: see User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Stanislav Shekshnia. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandrov98: See here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: What do you think? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Shekshnia --Alexandrov98 (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandrov98: It seems rather advertisory or like a CV (curriculum vitae). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: How about new version? Many thanks! --Alexandrov98 (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable as either a businessman or an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know nothing about Stanislav Shekshnia except by reading this article. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, looks like a successful businessman, but too little coverage by independent sources to justify passing WP:GNG or WP:BIO; nothing to show passing WP:PROF either. A large portion of the article contains personal info not sourced to any sources, presenting a WP:BLP problem. The entire article looks a bit like a WP:G11 case. Nsk92 (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Publish The academic meets the following condictions: 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. 5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. 6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. 7. The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. --Alexandrov98 (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.