Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike Volleyball Magazine (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spike Volleyball Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedily renominating as the previous discussion was closed as no consensus. Rationale remains the same; the sources that were added to the article probably aren't enough to establish notability (the award does not appear to be a major award). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete only primary sources provided. Magazine existed less than 3 years. LibStar (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- minor magazine, and the sources provided do not IMO establish notability. Reyk _YO! 13:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing good at all to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.