Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpiderWorks Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SpiderWorks Technologies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical promo puff piece with possible concerns of UPE/COI. Does not meet NCORP requirements . Thesixserra (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Thesixserra (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*:SpiderWorks is a notable digital marketing company in Kerala, India. There isn't any promo content including in the article. Only factual information including the founder, locations, and their key services are included in this content. Krishnenduhareesh (talk) 05:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Sock (Non-administrator comment) – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 14:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 1 gnews hit says it all. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A corporate-website-type article previously declined at AfC, setting out a small company's wares and office addresses, supported by routine listings and a brief summary of a conference speech, none of which is sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches do not find the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The three listed sources don't really seem reliable. The first one mentioned the subject to be one of the 18 recipients of an award given by TechBehemoths. While I'm not familiar with TechBehemoths, the amount of recipients and their scarce reviews (most companies on the site shown to have around 5 reviews, 2 have even less) don't strike confidence in me; The second source only mentioned the subject in-passing as part of someone's former experience; and the third company seems to be a blog and promotional in nature. No other significant coverage can be found. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.