Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space kingley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 16:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Space kingley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBOOK. Article is about a minor, unnotable comic annual from the U.K. that was published in the 50's. Article is unreferenced, doesn't explain notability or importance, so since Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information WP:IINFO... Pstanton (talk) 07:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A minor rival to Dan Dare and perhaps worth a footnote there, but I can't find anything that shows notability. I imagine there were dozens of other Dan Dare clones. andy (talk) 08:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — Red Baboon (talk) 09:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not noteworthy. One issue, no cult following, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.