Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soup's On

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and close this early. Missvain (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soup's On[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It may be fitting to mention this short in a list page or similar, but does it really need it's own page? It's been unsourced and almost entirely plot summary since its creation. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I added more content to the page -- information about the production, television syndication and home video releases. The Encyclopedia of Walt Disney's Animated Characters specifically calls out Soup's On as "one of the truly classic contests between the Duck and the kids," and I added the book's commentary to the lede. I also added references from the Internet Animation Database, the book Disney's Voice Actors: A Biographical Dictionary, a review blog and a couple other sources. -- Toughpigs (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved since nomination and has significant real world content, and extra rs books referencing so deletion is no longer necessary imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep: Per WP:HEY and that it no longer qualifies under deletion criteria. Otr500 (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.