Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sommer Ray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 12:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sommer Ray[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a non-notable person which has been the focus of multiple socks in two groups. A paid piece? Cabayi (talk) 10:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as WP:TOOSOON. Most probably will be notable but suggest waiting at least a couple of years and preferably having an unaffiliated editor write it. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Naturally, there are no reliable sources out there about her. But people will continue making pointless articles on what is supposed to be an encyclopedia, about "Instagram famous" people who have no factual notability to their name and are simply known for having a big booty. Oh well. Trillfendi (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A7. The Forbes source is just a link to a search bar, not even a results page. This is presumably the intended article, but there's nothing useful there. —⁠烏⁠Γ ^(kaw) │ 22:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as WP:TOOSOON not yet WP:GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 23:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no major reliable sources about the subject, and not yet WP:GNG. —Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 03:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG. - Scarpy (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.