Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sister Furong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 14:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sister Furong[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Severe lack of high-quality and reliable sources, badly-written and non-neutral article. Shi has no evidence of notability, other than being a blogger. "Future" section still contains information from 2008. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 13:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sexuality and gender, Internet, and China. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 13:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: She has profiles in Popular Culture in Asia: Memory, City, Celebrity (ISBN 9781137270207) (pg. 171–173), Celebrity in China (ISBN 9789622090873) (Chapter 11 – China’s internet celebrity: Furong Jiejie), and this CNN article. Easily meets notability. (Also, I found more Google Books results when looking for "Furong Jiejie" if that helps.) Why? I Ask (talk) 14:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the sourcing given above, but wow does this need a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Due to the sources listed by Why? I Ask. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.