Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Abhay Vidhya Mandir, Hindaun city

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There has been no evidence provided to show that this school actually exists... "appearing to exist" does not fulfill the requirements for articles on secondary schools.. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shri Abhay Vidhya Mandir, Hindaun city[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: This school is not notable and no credible information available on Google search as well. There are mentions "here and there" but nothing credible. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This article was deleted earlier (was under slightly different name). Check this. Creator of this article is a habitual offender. FYI. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No sources at all, no claims of notability. --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 12:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -I'm seeing absolute zero independent, reliable sources, otherwise could have !voted keep per SCHOOLOUTCOMES #2. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per longstanding consensus and precedent. Certainly appears to exist and that's all that's required for a secondary school article. It was previously deleted after a prod with no discussion involved, so that's irrelevant. I'm also curious as to what the nominator means by saying the page creator is a "habitual offender". Would you care to elaborate? -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Necrothesp: -I would like to see a single reliable source that proves the existence of the school. Can you provide one, either here or in the article? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sources, while certainly not good, are sufficient to prove it exists. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's no reason to believe this school exists. Jacona (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.