Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shieldsquare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shieldsquare[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find at most minimal coverage meeting WP:ORGDEPTH. Largoplazo (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non notable; not meeting WP:Corp; promo, company piece. Kierzek (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete no evidence of significance DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the company definitely exists but there is no claim of notability either within or outside of the article Spiderone 12:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP, Meets WP:SPAM. Anup [Talk] 18:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.