Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaurya Doval (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shaurya Doval[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail; and unremarkable professional and "public policy thinker". What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Notability is not inherited from the subject's father, Ajit Doval. There's a minor controversy that relates to a nn think tank, but this insufficient for establishing notability. Created by Special:Contributions/Pruthvilakshman with no other contributions outside this topic.

The article has been previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaurya Doval (2018).

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E, the only coverage in reliable sources this person has received is in relation to a single controversy. The article is promotional to the extent that WP:TNT would apply even if he were notable. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG on their own. A redirect to the father would be okay, probably qualified for a speedy, since nothing's changed since the last AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.