Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamim A. Aarzoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 20:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shamim A. Aarzoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Non-notable person and his array of non-notable achievements. The articles about the societies, festivals and publications that Aarzoo has founded were all created by himself. The citations within the biography are almost all to the websites of those societies, festivals and publications, with the exception of some run-of-the-mill interest stories about the literary festival. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:Notability. Josu4u (talk) 23:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It should be noted that the creators of these articles have been identified as a sockfarm and blocked. (See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Iaarzoo.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete- Fails WP:GNG.Ireneshih (talk) 16:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Possible also created with WP:COI. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability whatsoever, COI issues aside. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All - pure promotionalism. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.