Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakthi Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shakthi Scott[edit]

Apparent autobiography. 20 year old subject is wholly nonnotable and fails WP:BIO. He landed an interview on a small special-interest website for a film he created over a few days. Article is strewn with unsourced claims. Google doesn't help at all when it comes to finding sources for verification of notability. Themfromspace (talk) 20:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC) -[reply]

Delete Looks like an autobiography; he's not really notable at all, those two links are the only things on the whole internet I can find about him. This google search revealed nothing relating to him at all, so none of his movies have been big. I say delete as non-notable and practically unverifiable — all we know is that he made one or two films, and the rest of the article could have been made up.--Patton 123 20:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and sandblast out the POV ONLY IF the various assertions of notability (filmmaker, muscian, award winner) can be properly sourced... and this is likely. Admittedly the current article is not suitable, but this can be fixed if sourced. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be sourced, I've done multiple searches and found nothing.--Patton 123 18:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. His only notability is being short-listed (if 500 can be considered a "short" list) in a relatively obscure competition run by some non-obscure names. If he wins, he MAY become notable, but he hasn't yet. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NOtability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non Notable --Deepak D'Souza 05:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--nom has done his homework. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.