Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shady Morsi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shady Morsi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, local politician, fails WP:NPOL, no sources found to support WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. No article on Dutch Wikipedia, btw. Sam Sailor 12:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 12:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 12:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete members of party comissions on a specific subject are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no notability claim here that would constitute an WP:NPOL pass, and no good sourcing for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG — the only non-primary source here is a photograph of the whole committee, not substantive coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I thought this was a hoax. As it stands, none of the sources count, and the only thing that came up in a search of him was a twitter account - I recognised his face in the second article, so perhaps it's not a hoax, but we absolutely can't keep what is basically an unsourced WP:BLP. SportingFlyer talk 09:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:NPOL and no sources to support WP:GNG (or even any claim in the article). Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.