Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Svechkar
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sergei Svechkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG, having searched for sources in English and Russian. signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Russia. signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Noting that additional sources were added but that they do little to establish a case for notability: [1] is a social media post, [2] is a local news source reporting that a seminar given by Svechkar was presented by Dynamo Vologda, his team, and provides no further analysis of Svechkar's biography or career. [3] is the same source, interviewing Svechkar for a brief comment on Dynamo Vologda's success, and [4] is an unbylined press release of Svechkar being hired at Dynamo Vologda. We are still entirely lacking independent coverage discussing Svechkar's life, play style, coaching style, or other biographic information that would justify an article. signed, Rosguill talk 15:58, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Rosguill's assessment of the available sourcing and agree that this is some way short of WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: per Rosguill's eval. // Timothy :: talk 14:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.