Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastiano Giudice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 20:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastiano Giudice[edit]

Contested PROD. Hoax player, no track of his existance in the whole web, and never mentioned in the website of his alleged club as well. [1] Angelo 18:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Angelo 22:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There have been Google returns with this name, but doesn't look to mention a football player.--JForget 23:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, no such player. EliminatorJR ^Talk 23:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be a hoax. 90.195.71.155 also keeps deleting afd box. Number 5 7 12:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Definite hoax. Dave101→talk 14:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This player definately never played for Banfield, definate misinformation, a hoax in my judgement.King of the North East 20:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only evidence for notability is an IP on the talk page saying "I am very good friends with him." Spellcast 19:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a single fact can be verified. --Malcolmxl5 20:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per EliminatorJR. Jogurney 14:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.