Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Reiss
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Reiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Sports, and California. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Radio, Television, Illinois, Missouri, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete: Apparently fails WP:NJOURNALIST. I was able to find two sources that satisfy SIGCOV ([1], [2]) and a few other passing mentions ([3], [4] (paywalled), [5]) but I don't think it's enough to satisfy GNG. Most of the sources I've found are WP:ROUTINE as well. — SamX [talk · contribs] 14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.