Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorn (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enigma^msg 03:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scorn (video game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage is not enough to pass WP:GNG and WP:NVIDEOGAMES. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll try to come back to this soon but a quick note, of sources in the article, only PCGamer is a reliable secondary source. -- ferret (talk) 18:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of mentions in reliable outlets that aren't merely regurgitating press releases. For example, this and the ones here._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In-depth coverage at EuroGamer, PC Gamer, RPS, Gamespot, IGN and Hardcoregamer. Also GamesRadar+ and a Kotaku mention, and Videogamer. wumbolo ^^^ 21:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As shown above, RS coverage is downright abundant for this game. Phediuk (talk) 01:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG Chetsford (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.