Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoolwork (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Coursework. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolwork

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Schoolwork is as I see it an extention of an article like Coursework and brings no meaningful value on its own and has very little potential in expanding. I think some information might be beneficial to merge and a redirect should be set up. EstablishedCalculus (talk) 05:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Redirecting the useful bits would be normal- but I am at a loss to find any useful bits. We have Glossary of education terms and none of the three words occcurs. The lead is repetitious and contradictory, and this sets the tone of the piece. Each section has conditionals like 'generally', 'normally' on most cases. The suggestion that teachers have discretion on when and how to set assessments talks of the halcyon days of the past in the UK. The section containing wlinks to the statistical terms Weighted average Arithmetic mean is barely true- this is could be expanded to include many areas of data analysis but then would be off focus, over prominent and subject to a move. The questions remains is there anything here that would add to other articles- would Wikipedia lose a single fact if the article was deleted. Nothing substantial has been added since the stub was created as a place holder in 2005. There was one attempt to delete, that recommended holding on and improving (hoping), though no suggestions on how. Delete. ClemRutter (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems to just be a vague and unsupported definition. JMWt (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Coursework – the two topics are closely related and this article, as stated above, is garbage. 165.91.13.168 (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per 165.91.13.168 as a {{R from alternate name}}. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: This is basically a subset of coursework. —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 03:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirection seems reasonable here. — regards, Revi 15:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Indeed a redirect seems appropriate here. I only wish this happened before the WP:TAFI period, so efforts could have been focused on the target coursework. Oh well! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Homework - I think the whole coursework vs. schoolwork vs. homework thing is kind of messed up. Maybe all three are duplicates? At the very least, homework is the only decent quality article among them, the others are stubs. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.