Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarey Savy

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 August 12.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarey Savy

Failed PROD and speedy nominations. Probable autobiography, and poorly written. Call me Bubba (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although poorly written, that doesn't constitute the necessity for deletion of an article. No reliable sources being cited or found myself on the subject, however, does lead me to believe that the article fails the notability guideline and thus should be deleted. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 04:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the author, who happens to have the same username as the subject's article (possible COI...), repeatedly violated WP:BLP by stating that he was the "close-" or "best-friend" of others, as in [1] and [2]. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 05:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable person with lack of reliable sources, possible conflict of interest due to article being created by Savy Sarey (talk · contribs). -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 04:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--yet another MySpace artist. There's no notability whatsoever here per WP:Band. Drmies (talk) 06:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't imagine why this wasn't speedied. 12 year old claims to be signed by Geffen? That would be big news. Pure hooey. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I thought I voted earlier but I must have goofed. Basically I mentioned that I tagged it for speedy deletion and then there are no valuable sources to be found about this 12 year old myspace singer. Themfromspace (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has been speedy deleted twice I believe, no notability, pure vanity autobio. Paste ^Talk 08:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I declined the most recent speedy because of the weak claims of importance, but then immediately prodded it with "There are enough claims of importance here to avoid an A7 speedy deletion, but gsearch not turning up notability. 0 gnews hits; 21 unique non-wiki ghits. Eliminate myspace and youtube, and there's just 2 hits left, neither of which shows notability". Nothing has changed since then to change my mind.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Geffen claim is highly likely to be a hoax, WP:COI, fails WP:MUSIC and WP:RS. — neuro^(talk) 17:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete User:Fabrictramp Was correct not to speedy it (although I deleted it under A7 a couple of days ago when it asserted no notability at all.) However the assertions are weak at best and overall there is not enought notability for inclusion in an encyclopedia Pedro : Chat 11:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.