Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saraswat Vidyalaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ which does not preclude a redirect if sourcing is found to be insufficient Star Mississippi 03:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saraswat Vidyalaya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 00:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Goa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, in the past, schools in India have had a fair amount of coverage discovered in ProQuest, which is down for TWL right now, so we might want to take this one slowly. —siro χ o 04:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mapusa#Education if insufficient coverage to establish notability. The college and high school exists. Rupples (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source. Found this [1]. Snippet view. Can't track the whole book to see if additional content but have added to article. Rupples (talk) 03:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is indeed a lot of coverage on ProQuest. Eg. A protest: [2]. Sports [3][4] etc. Other local coverage: [5][6]. There's a lot more there to sort through as well. —siro χ o 04:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Also moving towards a keep, but the article needs a bit more usable sourcing. As of now, it's not quite there. Rupples (talk) 05:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A second opinion on these newly located sources would be helpful as well as an assessment if they provide adequate SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: third relist in hopes of more discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mapusa#Education. Routine news any school would receive does not establish notability. Fails GNG and NORG, nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue (talk • contribs) 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.