Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Nair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Money Ratnam. Article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Santhosh Nair[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Put a prod up but changing it to a AFD-only has directed one film so far, too soon issue here. Wgolf (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per nom, as WP:TOOSOON. There were lots of routine reviews of the movie but very little information about the director. The best source I could find was this, which tells us that he was an assistant director for 13 years. But that's about all. Perhaps later. (Note that this is English sources only. There may be more in other languages.) – Margin1522 (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – The subject's first name was misspelled in the templates (it is Santhosh, not Santosh). I just corrected it. – Margin1522 (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless there's more information to make him meet notability standards. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Money Ratnam -There are quite sources but enough to help subject meet WP:FILMMAKER or WP:GNG standard at this time. For now redirect it to what they are known for --PER WP:ATD-R, -[1], [2], [3], etc. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.