Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandoz, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandoz, California[edit]

Sandoz, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taken from a Forest Service map, but topos show nothing there but an unlabelled building until the name got copied to the map from GNIS. GMaps shows a barn, a shed, and a house; I surmise that someone named Sandoz once lived here. I could find nothing else through searching. Mangoe (talk) 19:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Definitely a Sandoz family that lived here, which is why it appeared on maps in this sparsely populated area. A Fuchs family is next to a Sandoz family on the 1930 and 1940 censuses, which is no doubt the source of Fuchs, California, and there is a joint-families cemetery for them. [1]. The families came from Switzerland. None of this confers notability (nor for Fuchs), I just find it interesting.--Milowenthasspoken 21:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Searches have turned up almost nothing. Does not pass basic test for notability. Glendoremus (talk) 04:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article does not meet WP:N.   // Timothy :: talk  01:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:MILL. Without any source, we can't assume it's ever been inhabited. Bearian (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.