Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samut Prakan United Stadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect. Seems like nobody wants to close this. Consensus is to merge and redirect to the "relevant parent article", however, I'm not entirely clear whether the voters consider that to be the article on the location (i.e., Samut Prakan Province) or the article on the team (i.e., Samut Prakan United F.C.). I'm going to close this as though they're going to be merged into the relevant team, however the folks doing the merge should use their discretion to ensure that any useful content from each article (there isn't much) is merged into whereever it will be the most useful, and then redirect the article. ST47 (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samut Prakan United Stadium[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOFEAT. I would also like to nominate these articles for the same reason.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep - Given these are stadiums based in different parts of Thailand, I think it's a fair assumption that the levels of coverage could differ; plus the language barrier. If deletion is right, it will come - no rush. R96Skinner (talk) 00:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect each to their relevant parent article - but agree that this kind of bundling is inappropriate. Giant Snowman 08:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge then redirect - I'm not concerned with the bundling procedure here - every one of these articles is an entirely unsourced blurb about a Thai football stadium, and while I want to make sure we don't lose any information, there's not much here to merge, really just co-ordinates, and those are already in the parent articles (I've added a couple to the titles.) Most if not all of the parent club articles appear notable but also need sourcing, so I disagree leaving these as a procedural keep - something needs to be done with these articles, and I would recommend keeping them on their parent articles until someone comes along capable of referencing them in Thai. SportingFlyer T·C 03:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect each to their relevant parent article.4meter4 (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect is probably the best way forward. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as failing WP:V which is policy. I am big on redirecting NN articles wherever possible but that is simply not an option here. First of all, redirecting to an article where the subject is not mentioned should always be avoided as it simply annoys the reader who spends time searching the target in vain. Secondly, we should avoid merging unsourced material. Finally, the only source that I can find that looks in any way reliable is here, and this is linked from the Uthai Thani Province Stadium page, but none of these stadiums are mentioned in this source. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 20:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.