Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SaaS Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SaaS Labs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company with PR drived sources and no independent coverage. Lordofhunter (talk) 07:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, India, and United States of America. Lordofhunter (talk) 07:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. None of the sources provided offer any meaningful independent analysis of the business or its products; all the coverage simply repeats the company's own description of itself, its funding and acquisition announcements, numerical facts submitted by the company, and statements made by company representatives during interviews. Red flags in the article include citation of a contributor article in Forbes; in this particular case, the TechCrunch articles are also not much better. Fails WP:NCORP. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The references provided fall into funding announcements, acquisition announcements, product feature summaries, and appearance in fastest-growing lists, all of which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches are not finding better. I agree with the opinion above that the available references lack the depth and independence needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of reliable sources. Curntag (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC) — Curntag (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.