Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STEM in tennis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

STEM in tennis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced so it's original research and opinion. I originally moved it to draft space but no real improvements were made. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTESSAY and GNG. CoconutOctopus talk 12:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per OR and NOTESSAY, sources about specific aspects cobbled together in one article despite no source about it as a whole. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 13:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article might be mergeable if there were any sources but as it stands it's not suitable. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:RS. Feels like someone uploaded their school essay as an article. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Judging by the user's only two edits to other pages, which are reviews of other new users' drafts, and one their reviews at Talk:STEM in tennis, this is obviously a class assignment. How can we stop this junk and teachers having newbies start their own new pages without going through AFC? Reywas92^Talk 19:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of WP:OR per the above. Left guide (talk) 00:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DELREASON#14: Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia. This is plainly a WP:NOTESSAY violation. TompaDompa (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.