Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSA Architects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SSA Architects[edit]

SSA Architects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly non-notable firm. No in-depth independent, reliable references can be found that establish its notability. The creator has a problematic history of creating other articles like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imperial 3 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery Offices. This one fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:ORG. MaysinFourty (talk) 16:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom Spiderone 22:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Couldn't find anything that would establish notability. Delete per nom.   // Timothy :: talk  06:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.