Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Bromby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 18:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Bromby[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article fails GNG, ANYBIO, BASIC. Sources in article are two primary and one promotional. Essentially and unsourced BLP. BEFORE showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 17:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Australia, and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR. Unless someone can find evidence of winning a major award. LibStar (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All sources are primary. Fails WP:GNG. Couldn't find much else on google // GMH Melbourne (talk) 10:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails notability per above. Alex-h (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.