Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rika Sato (actress)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tensou Sentai Goseiger as an WP:ATD Salvio giuliano 08:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rika Sato (actress)[edit]

Rika Sato (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article is not notable and a WP:Before shows nothing meaningful. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Japan. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. A Google search turned up a couple of mentions of the subject along with other voice actresses. No notability has been shown using reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:BASIC. AuthorAuthor (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - If you check out the Japanese version of her page - https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%95%E3%81%A8%E3%81%86%E9%87%8C%E9%A6%99, she's notable as she has done tv shows, photo books, music, movies and so forth. And in general, any article that has 4 other pages in other languages should strongly hint towards notability. I don't know if I'm up for basically re-writing the article right now though.KatoKungLee (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom. If you check the link above to ja.wp, it shows no references and is substituting their oown opinion for notability criteria using WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST arguments and the nonsense other Wikipedia language claim ("...any article that has 4 other pages in other languages..."). IS RS with SIGCOV alone show notability: Wikipedia in any language is not a reliable source for content or notability; if IS RS with SIGCOV sources are found inother Wikipedias they can be obviously used, but the articles themselves are in no way an indication of notability. The above fails to mention there are no sources and moves on to mistake popularity or notarity for notability ("she's notable as she has done tv shows, photo books, music, movies and so forth"). Popularity does not equal notability per WP:BIO.
An actual BEFORE in en and ja showed only promo material, database style listings, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:RS).  // Timothy :: talk  01:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.