Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RetouchMe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RetouchMe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy article with nothing reliable coming up when googling for sources. All that's cited, and all that I find, are the same spammy promo junk. Fails WP:GNG –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly promotional. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 15:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant advert. this should've been G11'd. Graywalls (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! thank you for your comments I tried to improve the article, like removing a lot of unnecessary information and changing the structure. Please see if this article is still subject to removal after these actions.Yuraprox (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.