User talk:Yuraprox

Yuraprox, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Yuraprox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Yuraprox. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page RetouchMe, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 14:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RetouchMe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RetouchMe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RetouchMe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 09:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yuraprox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! Perhaps, some misunderstanding has happened. I have reviewed MER-C's remarks and Wikipedia rules. If I'm not mistaken, MER-C have blocked my account because of using links from IT-companies's blogs. For the first time, I've taken the remarks into account and decided to correct my mistakes. MER-C have deleted some links, but the information was left untouched. Thus I considered it my duty to find new sources. For that time I didn't use links on the company's website but I have found their research-document on Outsourcing in Ukraine, a great addition to the article, I thought. Now I guess it became the reason to block my account. Even more, it became the reason to delete all my edits in the DataArt article. However, it is a great misunderstanding and I am sincerely sorry for being not experienced enough. Please, unblock my original account and revert the DataArt article to the previous version. My plan was to put things in order in the articles about the IT-companies (like DataArt) related to Ukraine. In particular, I plan to continue editing in the following articles: Luxoft, Ciklum, Netcracker Technology, etc. Besides, according to the remarks, the article Outsourcing in Ukraine still needs to be improved. I also used other blog links in it and MER-C did not delete them. The reason, again, is in my lack of awareness.

My work displays the area of my interests. First of all, it is about Ukrainian IT. Thus I decided to start a Wikipedia acquaintance from a well-known field. DataArt is interesting for me as it is a big company founded by Ukrainians with main offices in Ukraine. I decided to improve this article because it was poor and needed sources to confirm. However, if someone else took up the job, would they have done it differently than I did? Therefore, it is very unfortunate and incomprehensible to me what is the problem with my edits in this article. I tried to do it following the Wikipedia rules. At least, I was writing about the information freely available on the Internet. If I am mistaken, please be so kind to point out my mistakes. In such a way, Wikipedia will get one more dedicated editor. Yuraprox (talk) 17:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.