Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent Reporters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rent Reporters[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links me to user generated sources which we do not consider reliable when establishing notability. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This content is irretrievable and I agree that should be deleted, but I do think there might be an encyclopaedic piece of writing to be done about the issue of rent payments not boosting someone's credit score. If so it would belong at Credit score in the United States#Criticism rather than as a separate topic of itself.—S Marshall T/C 12:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see anything in the article that'd help it pass GNG or a relevant subjective criteria. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 13:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ALso, please visit this other AfD discussion. Mausebru (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.