Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Cataldi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renato Cataldi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Claims of "awards from the annual Salon organised by Escola Nacional de Belas Artes" cannot be verified, and inclusion in Louzadas Indice consolidado artes plasticas brasil 94 [Dictionary of Arts] does not indicate significant coverage. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I was not able to find online reliable sources, but my experience with Brazilian Art is that generally online sources are not available. We have a book as a source in the article, which (the first one) seems to be a RS.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica (₵) 04:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.