Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reconquista based on Mythology and False Assumptions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reconquista based on Mythology and False Assumptions[edit]
- Reconquista based on Mythology and False Assumptions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Essay full of original research. Personal reflections and no references. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Identical article already present at Southwest territories which in turn is almost certainly recreation of a deleted page Southwest Territories. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Now our friend has created two more identical articles: Reconquista Myth based on False Assumptions and Southwest Territories.
- speedy delete OR POV rant. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Mycroft7 (talk) 18:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. OR. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as pure OR. Given the creator's penchant for recreating the article, perhaps the discussion should run to closing (whenever that is). If the article is recreated in its current form it would then be eligible for G4 treatment. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yeah, we get it, the southwest USA belonged to the Indians before it belonged to Mexico. Anywhere else in the Western Hemisphere you'd like to educate us about? Mandsford (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete unfixable rant. Reads like somebody's angry letter to the editor. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Starblind puts it best. Edward321 (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.