Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recaldent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recaldent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The advice on my other submission on my other Article for Deletion, suggested another listing for this specific page, so i have. My reasons for nominating this article are that, it is a blatant advertisement article, promotes named brand all over the place without giving actual scientific evidence or effectiveness for its claims.--RuleTheWiki (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and remove the brand name, which is currently the title and mentioned in the lead. Once this is done it can be properly evaluated for com0liance with the WP:MEDRS standards. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with nom: it is an advertisement without proper secondary source references. DeVerm (talk) 01:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is it really that bad? The brand name appears only in the title and one mention in the lead. The references are a bunch of scientific journal articles (normally regarded as the best type of sources) I'm not so sure they can be dismissed so casually. At the very least the sources should be indivudually evaluated per MEDRS. As a chemical substance that has been described in scientific literature it is notable, regardless of considerations such as usefulness. Chemical substances, much like living species, are notable merely for having been confirmed to exist and properly described. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thing is there is already a page about Amorphous Calcium Phosphate which includes a section on its combination with Casein Phosphopeptide, so this page doesn't really have any purpose to that effect, this article could just as easily slide into Amorphous calcium phosphate or Remineralisation of teeth, either way, a blatant advertisement article, with mediocre sources and even a Trademark Icon on it, this page needs to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuleTheWiki (talk • contribs) 13:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.