Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Read Across America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to National Education Association. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read Across America

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not formatted at all like an encyclopedia. No or very few reliable sources can be found for this article. Interstellarity (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like an elementary school project. Few notable sources used. Oaktree b (talk) 21:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 00:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence this passes WP:NORG/WP:NEVENT/GNG. But why is it categorized under fictional elements? It's a real world initiative, not a fictional one. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to National Education Association. The event gets lots of local coverage, but I can't find much large-scale coverage beyond this article from Forbes (written by staff) and this notice from the White House. Content needs to be re-written for the merge though, as it currently reads like a press release ("our schools"). Argento Surfer (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is no evidence of the level of secondary source coverage needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested. FWIW, I was formerly affiliated with the NEA. Bearian (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Spudlace (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.