Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramdas Palsule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ramdas Palsule[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete over copyright: compare http://www.ramdaspalsule.com/about.htm and http://spicmacay.tamu.edu/about_artists/palsule . Also notability? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see the person is notable so article should be kept. The editor seem new to Wikipedia who is copy pasting content from other site. He/She should be informed about copyright violation and how to/what to add in Wikipedia. I agree for removal of copyvio text from article ASAP. -Nizil (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: With this edit I have removed the most obvious copyvio passage and will suggest that the author rewrites it. No opinion on notability, but anyone considering it should look at this version before my cut. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Having written about in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources, subject meet the Wikipedia's inclusion standard ([1]). Majority of the sources, however are in Hindi and Marathi language. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now well referenced. If copy violations are resolved, should be kept. GOCE work should help if kept.--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.