Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramat Shilo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Ramat Beit Shemesh. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ramat Shilo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page shows no proof of notability, with trivial references and synthesized content. It appears that a major reason for creating this page was as a platform for the Pilzner Rav, who does not have reliable references. I would have suggested merging this page with Ramat Beit Shemesh, but that page does not exist and the Ramat Beit Shemesh section under Beit Shemesh is quite short. Yoninah (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that that this article should be converted into a subsection of an article on Ramat Beit Shemesh. However, first, Ramat Beit Shemesh needs to be created as an independent page. There is much notable information to say about Ramat Beit Shemesh on every level - demographically, culturally, religiously, historically and politically and it should not be buried under the Beit Shemesh page. Once the new page is created, Ramat Shilo can be merged with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ד (talkcontribs) 10:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  04:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  01:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.