Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramaiah Kuntumalla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While there's low participation, the fact that this is a BLP with source issues and irrelevant claims, I'm going ahead with the deletion that's recommended. —SpacemanSpiff 14:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaiah Kuntumalla[edit]

Ramaiah Kuntumalla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After the BLP Prod was placed, the editor who created the article moved the article to a non-existing user's userspace, then copied the article back and removed the BLP Prod. There is one source provided which looks unreliable. Irrespective of that, the subject does not qualify either on GNG or SNG. Lourdes 07:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A7 material. I fail to see any claim of notability in article; that filmography section is misleading. Anup [Talk] 04:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.