Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Smart (life coach)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Smart (life coach)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I am unable to find significant discussion of him in multiple reliable sources. Original version of article was quite promotional before it was put under control by other editors. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is a Tai Lopez wannabe. He has no press coverage from reliable third party sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonstephen0 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can’t find any evidence of notability. In addition, although ‘psychologist’ isn’t a protected title, he only holds a Bachelors degree and any use of that term might be taken to imply a level of professional expertise that the subject does not have. Mccapra (talk) 02:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.