Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radha Gopinath Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus was to delete, there was only one unrebutted keep !vote. I will wp:userfy on request. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radha Gopinath Temple

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no coverage in third party reliable sources independent of the subject that is sufficient for inclusion. Wikid ^as© 10:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not to be cofused with possibly notable temples in Vrindavana and Nagpur, Maharashtra. Wikid ^as© 15:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here's a good source if you want to improve the article: [1] Dew Kane (talk) 04:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dew Kane's link shows the Radha Gopinath temple at Vrindavan, Mathura (like WikiD has cautioned above). This one is a relatively new temple with no significant coverage in independent sources.--Sodabottle (talk) 08:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable, search for ISKCON Chowpatty [2][3] --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[4]: one of 4 temples in and around Mumbai. Chowpatty one in city, Juhu (Mumbai main temple) in suburban. Khargar and Mira Road outside Mumbai boundaries. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rabbabodrool (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; until reliable sources are found that attribute notability to this temple. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.