Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Antoniadou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Antoniadou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Antoniadou is a college basketball player without enough coverage to justify having an article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As far as I can tell there is quite sufficient for notability, quite sufficient NEXISTs. Looks like material for an improved article. If anything perhaps TOOSOON but I do not think so this time. Aoziwe (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS Has had success at international representative level. Aoziwe (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Rikster2 (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. I'm not seeing multiple sources of significant coverage, particularly from independent sources. Nothing in WP:NBASKETBALL presumes notability from playing in the WNBL or being a member of a national team. Incidentally, she's only played on an under-18 team, not even a senior team. But again, notability not presumed by being on a national basketball teams. WP:NOLYMPICS not met.—Bagumba (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete representing at WNBL is not sufficient. And her highest international level is under 18s. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.