Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest Global (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quest Global[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the coverage is routine-based like acquistions and mergers or press releases published by the company. Clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH. US-Verified (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A lot of refs, some are routine, some are promotional, none show passing GNG or NCORP. The use of press releases and company sources for much of the article show this is a promotional article, intentional or not. // Timothy :: talk 13:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 20:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: an advertorially toned page for an unremarkable private company. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH per review of available sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.--Bexaendos (talk) 23:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.