Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progression of Belgium association football goalscoring record
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Progression of Belgium association football goalscoring record (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For the following reasons:
- Per consensus established in this similar AfD.
- No evidence that the topic of 'progression of ___ goalscoring record' meets the requirements for a stand-alone list as per WP:LISTN
- There are issues with WP:NOTSTATS as well
- Wikipedia is more than simply a mirror of RSSSF and IFFHS per WP:NOTMIRROR
- Also borderline WP:SYNTH concerns
No prejudice against merging if a suitable target is suggested. Spiderone 16:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 16:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Merge with Belgium national football team records or similar article. GiantSnowman 20:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I fail to see why this should be merged into an article that's already excessive with statistic. Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 23:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 08:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 08:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, it's SYNTH/OR since the article creator manually counts goals and makes up the list as a secondary source. Geschichte (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.