Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Women's Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Madison Eagles. WP:ATD and no consensus to keep. Any wanted content merging can be done outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) ––Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 18:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Women's Alliance[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Claim to notability overblown. Not a notable promotion. No substantive independent sourcing that isn't subject to other problems such casual mentions only. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:39ED:AF0C:516:142E (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor--comments above are copied from article's talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 04:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there are some notable things that happened (such as the SHIMMER championship being defended in Australia), but the promotion itself isn't notable. How did the refs all end up with "Cagematch.netg"? Of the 29 sources indicated, only the GFW link really adds any notability, and my WP:BEFORE search didn't bring up much else. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not even meet WP:GNG. Severe case of WP:REFBOMBING. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was going to defend this on the basis of the claim "notability overblown" when it's a fact that it's the only women's promotion in Australia. But after reading the two previous comments, in particular the note about ref bombing I decided to agree with the nomination. Addicted4517 (talk) 11:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the founder's article Madison Eagles. This is still a likely search term as there is still some coverage in reliable sources, however they are only passing mentions. At this time coverage does not exist to meet WP:GNG for a standalone article. A merge of some information to Eagles article would also be appropriate. StaticVapor message me! 20:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On it's own that would be a good alternative, except that Pro Wrestling Australia/Alliance redirects to this article. Eagles has nothing to do with that. Just making the point. Addicted4517 (talk) 23:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The PWA redirect can be retargeted to the Professional wrestling in Australia article or some other article that mentions the promotion. No need to target that to Eagles, just the article we are discussing. StaticVapor message me! 07:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.