Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Beach Hockey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Beach Hockey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just to be pedantic, WP:SPORTCRIT applies to individual sports-persons, not to leagues.WP:ORG does, however, apply and in that case, this fails on WP:CORPDEPTH. Only coverage was by ESPN which was also investor and therefore not independent. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.