Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Felicitas of Prussia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Felicitas of Prussia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources; she is only mentioned in passing in genealogy publications. This article too serves as a mere genealogical entry. The only prose in the article is information about other people, namely her father. The rest is pure genealogy. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for genealogical entries, however; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. Surtsicna (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no indication of notability.Smeat75 (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article consists almost entirely of routine genealogical information, unclear that we should describe her as a princess, claim to notability is that she is the granddaughter of the last Crown Prince of Germany, born after Germany abolished its nobility. PatGallacher (talk) 01:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and lack of content about the person. If kept, move to Felicitas von Nostitz-Waldwitz, her actual name. ("Prinzessin von Preußen" was her maiden name, and not a title as there was no Kingdom of Prussia during her lifetime). —Kusma (t·c) 08:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV - there's a couple of good sources in the article, and she was royalty in her own right. Bearian (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, she was born after her country abolished royalty.Smeat75 (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly cannot tell how you see significant coverage in the sources cited in the article. One of them is about her daughter and the other is a death announcement (not even an obituary). Surtsicna (talk) 22:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' when she was born it was almost 15 years since the monarchy had been abolished. There is nothing at all even remote to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.