Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Time: Charity Anthology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Time: Charity Anthology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was nominated for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertisement. I declined because it is not unambiguous IMO but certainly has a very strong whiff.

Adds: Another by the same editor: After Dark: Charity Anthology with the same issues.

Tóraí (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable anthology by a collection of non-notable authors, published by a non-notable publisher. The spammy tone could be managed, if there were a reason to retain this article. The fact that the original editor claims on her user page to be a "marketer and PR girl at a publishing press" certainly makes the whiff of promotion stronger. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment My delete !vote applies equally to both articles. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was about to tag it as a speedy since it's pretty promotional in tone and intent, as all it's missing is the price tag. Either way, these are decidedly non-notable and both should be deleted. I note that the original editor has been warned against using Wikipedia for spam purposes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional yes, but not a speediable promotion. Fails N. 209.255.230.32 (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as promotional. Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.