Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrideGP Grand Prix 2003

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ansh 666 03:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PrideGP Grand Prix 2003[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Coin945 (talk) 09:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have found nothing to indicate notability. There maybe some Japanese sources but after a Japan specific search I did not find anything the stood out as being a reliable source. Mattg82 (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Review on GameFAQs, GameSpot page with video Previews, GameSpot Impressions article, Also, unsure if it is simply a different release version of Pride FC: Fighting Championships Lee Vilenski(talk) 19:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep As the year was in 2003, online info search does show some info but not many. Here found [1], https://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2/919012-pridegp-grand-prix-2003/reviews/64641] and [2]. No major newspaper source found on the game release (maybe in JP version), but the above sources (including sources fromuser:Lee Vilenski) suffice its nobility. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 06:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The other's are fine, but the GameFAQs one isn't a critic review. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.